On 2 January 2014 12:23, David Lowry <email@example.com> wrote:
I wonder whether you are still considering publishing my letter?
Dr David Lowry
To: David Lowry
|From:||firstname.lastname@example.org on behalf of Letters Editor (email@example.com) This sender is in your contact list.|
|Sent:||02 January 2014 19:02:58|
|To:||David Lowry (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Dear Dr Lowry
I'm afraid the moment has passed.
Your letter had a very interesting angle and we would have liked to publish it. But
it was difficult to accommodate such a long letter. We had shorter ones on Mandela,
which were easier to place.
Sorry to disappoint you.
Deputy Letters Editor
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:56:47 +0000
Subject: Re: Mandela's nuclear disarmament mission
To: email@example.comDear Dr LowryThank you for your excellent letter - which is on our shortlist for publication.I've made a slight change to this paragraph about Ukraine and Kazakhstan andjust want to check with you please that I've interpreted it correctly..."Former Soviet states, Ukraine and Kazakhstan, also got rid of nuclear WMDs, butthese were inherited from the former Soviet Union – they had not built the weaponsthemselves as independent states."Kind regardsIan HoldsworthDeputy Letters EditorOn 8 December 2013 14:07, David Lowry <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The Editor, letters, The Financial Times
One issue not properly covered in your extensive news reportage of Nelson Mandela's death and feature coverage celebrating his life (6&7 December) was his international fight to rid the world of the threat from nuclear weapons.
South Africa ended its own nuclear weapons programme in 1989, the year before Mr Mandela was released from prison. Shortly after he was elected President by acclaim on 9 May 1994, on the 19th August after completing its inspection, the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that one partially completed and six fully completed nuclear weapons had been dismantled, thus making South Africa the first nation to unilaterally disinvest itself of its nuclear WMDs .
(Former Soviet states the Ukraine and Kazakhstan also got rid of nuclear WMDs inherited from the former Soviet Union, but they had not built the weapons themselves as independent states)
South Africa's nuclear disarmament gave President Mandela a huge moral advantage in his campaign against all nuclear WMDs.
In his final speech as South Africa's President to the United Nations General Assembly on 21st September 1998, he recalled that the very first resolution of the General Assembly, adopted in January 1946, sought to "address the challenge of the elimination from national armaments of atomic weapons and all other major weapons adaptable to mass destruction."
He drew attention to the document submitted by the non-aligned states, including South Africa, to the UN General Assembly in 1998 titled Towards a Nuclear Weapon Free World: The Need for a New Agenda," and called upon all members of the United Nations to "seriously to consider this important resolution and to give it their support."
In his closing remarks he said forcefully: “We must ask the question, which might sound naive to those who have elaborated sophisticated arguments to justify their refusal to eliminate these terrible and terrifying weapons of mass destruction - why do they need them anyway?”
That was an apposite question 15 years ago, and remains just as apposite today. David Cameron rightly described Nelson Mandela as a "true global hero."
He should now answer the late President Mandela's pointed question