A key message from the UK Committee on Climate Change
(CCC’s) 267-page annual report 2018 (Reducing UK emissions – 2018 Progress Report
to Parliament)
is found at p.71, published on
28 June, which reads:
"If new nuclear
projects were not to come forward, it is likely
that renewables would be able to be deployed on shorter timescales and at lower
cost."[my
emphasis] (https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CCC-2018-Progress-Report-to-Parliament.pdf)
But you would not find this very important assessment
in the British media coverage. Why might this be?
Perhaps because on the day before, the UK Government
published its long-trailed so-called ‘Nuclear
Industry Sector Deal’(https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-deal-with-industry-to-secure-uk-civil-nuclear-future-and-drive-down-cost-of-energy-for-customers),
on which the media clearly had been well
briefed in advance.
The key message from this BEIS policy announcement, backed
by a suite of documents, may be summarised by reference to Business Secretary
Greg Clark’s comments at the official launch:
“The UK is the home of civil nuclear technology and with this investment in innovation and our commitment to increasing diversity in an already highly-skilled workforce, I want to ensure we remain the world leader.
Nuclear energy not only fuels our power supply, it fuels
local jobs, wages, economic prosperity and drives UK innovation. This Sector
Deal marks an important moment for the government and industry to work
collectively to deliver the modern Industrial Strategy, drive clean growth and
ensure civil nuclear remains an important part of the UK’s energy future.”
Here are some other interesting extracts on nuclear’s role
and renewables’ capacity possibilities from the CCC report to MPs and peers.
•Power generation. The Government's plans to decarbonise UK power
generation to below100 gCO2 per
kWh by 2030 rely to a high degree on new nuclear build and net imports across
interconnectors, both of which have associated risks. These risks should be
mitigated by actions aimed at improving the route to market for low-carbon
electricity generation, especially low-cost options (i.e. onshore wind and
solar), and by contracting for addition allow-carbon generation.
New power sector scenarios
In our Power Sector Scenarios for the
Fifth Carbon Budget report in 2015, we identified an emissions intensity of
under 100 gCO2/kWh in 2030 as the
cost-effective path to the 2050 target. This was based on continuing the strong
progress the UK has made in power sector decarbonisation in the 2010s with
low-cost deployment of onshore wind, solar and possibly nuclear, alongside
programmes of offshore wind and CCS in the 2020s, where UK deployment can be
expected to be important in reducing the costs of these technologies.
Since that report, there have been
developments that affect the prospects for the deployment of low-carbon
capacity:
• Renewable costs have fallen rapidly. The
most recent auctions for 'established' technologies procured contracts for
offshore wind at around £62/MWh for delivery in the early 2020s - in line with
prices elsewhere in Europe but 40% below where we had expected the cost of the
technology would be by 2030. Although there have been no UK auctions to reveal
the cost for onshore wind or solar, these are also widely understood to have
fallen significantly (Figure 2.6).26
• Significant
delays in CCS deployment. In November
2015, the Government cancelled the CCS Commercialisation Programme, meaning
that the two initial CCS plants in our commercialisation pathway will not be
delivered.
• Limited progress in
new nuclear. The aim is for the Hinkley Point C plant to commission in
2025, but limited progress has been made with other new nuclear projects, aside
from the recent announcements around the Wylfa nuclear plant. Site development
and regulatory approval milestones have been passed, though formal negotiations
have only just begun with one developer, raising questions over the likelihood
of several new nuclear plants commissioning before 2030, beyond the Hinkley
Point C project.
Continued power sector
decarbonisation is likely to be no more expensive than alternative pathways for
the power sector, such as increased gas generation paying a market carbon price
in the UK or importing electricity from abroad (Box 2.2). The Government's
existing plans can deliver 210 TWh of the 255-270 TWh required to reduce
emissions to 100gCO2/kWh by 2030. A further 50-60 TWh of renewables could be deployed in the
2020s at no,or minimal, additional cost to consumers, although nuclear and CCS
projects are likely to be more expensive. Successful
delivery of further nuclear projects beyond Hinkley Point C or CCS projects in
power could reduce this emissions intensity towards 50 gCO2/kWh.
""..."If new nuclear projects were not to come forward, it is likely that renewables would be able to be deployed on shorter timescales and at lower cost."...""
ReplyDelete950 MW Moray East Offshore Windfarm [MEOW] willhave an average 31.25% capacity factor over its 25 year lifespan, at a cost of £1,800 million. It would take 9.7 MEOWs to deliver the same amount of electricity each year as Hinkley - albeit the intermittent variety that will forever require fossil fuelled back up. That's a cost of £17,460 million.
But they would all have to be built a 2nd time and be 10 years into the 3rd build to deliver for the 60 year design life of Hinkley. That's a factor of X2.4 and a cost of £41,904 million.
Certainly not lower cost and most unlikely on a shorter timescale.