Letter sent to the Guardian:
Neither your experienced columnist Simon
Jenkins ( a former editor of both the London
Evening Standard and The Times) (“This
grand design shows MPs have lost it,” 10 May; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/10/mps-palace-parliament-temporary) nor your correspondent Matt
Dobson from Tyne and wear (letters, 11 May; https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/10/dreams-of-a-modern-parliament-are-as-crumbled-as-the-palace)
understand
why, for practical and cost reasons, Parliament and Government buildings have
to be located very close together.
Both advocate moving the House of Commons
debating chamber, in the former case, to Birmingham or Manchester, in the latter,
to have a “roaming” chamber.
But Parliament is not just the debating
chamber. There is crucially the library, the best political resource in the
country, with many thousands of books and documents. Most are unavailable digitally. Then there are
the offices for the staff of some 650 MPs plus the over thirty meeting rooms needed for parliamentary
committees, some of which meet right up to the moment the House of Commons
starts each day, some of which meet in parallel with debates in the chamber.
The House of Commons also has a secondary
mini chamber in Westminster Hall, which MPs hold precious to ensure matters
pressed by constituents have a forum to be fully debated alongside the main
chamber.
Unless the entire government suite of
departmental headquarters were moved along with the Commons, then ministers would
remain based in Westminster with their
officials, and be unable to be called at
short notice to justify government policy
decisions in the many urgent questions rightly granted by the Speaker since
he promoted this form of immediate
scrutiny.
Finally, moving parliament out of Westminster
is unnecessary to bring MPS closer to their constituents. Less than 100 MPS
represent constituencies in or near London. The others regularly return to
their constituencies each weekend and every holiday breal from Parliament, to
hold surgeries, open fetes and speak at local public meetings.
There are many opportunities to “get out and
see where the decisions made in the great building on the Thames are having an effect”, as Mr
Dobson puts it.
No comments:
Post a Comment