Jeremy Corbyn was attacked
last night in the Sky/Channel 4 debate by an Irish audience member called
Callum for ”openly supporting the IRA in the past. The question came after a
week of articles and features in the conservative press, especially the Daily
Mail and Daily Telegraph, with acres of newsprint on Jeremy Corbyn’s many past meetings,
or joint platforms in public events, with individuals or groups dubbed as ‘terrorists’,
including Sinn Fein and various Palestinian
organizations, including Hamas, which currently runs the Gaza strip in
Palestine.
Corbyn has a long nearly forty
year record in Parliament of scrutinising
anti-terrorism legislation – by both Labour
and Conservative Governments. Here is what Corbyn said in one such debate in 1990, on so-called ‘Prevention of
Terrorism’ legislation
I
oppose the order. I draw to the attention of the House the fact that the first
person in this country to be arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act was Paul Hill, a
constituent of mine, who was arrested after the Guildford arid Woolwich pub
bombings. It later transpired not only that he was not in Guildford or Woolwich
and, therefore, did not plant any of the bombs—he was not guilty and could not
have been—but that the other three who were imprisoned as a result of
confessions that were extracted from them under the Prevention of Terrorism Act could not have been
guilty. They served 15 years in prison and an enormous campaign was mounted for
their release. They were released because of that campaign, the widespread
national and international support that they received arid the admission that
was finally made by the Director of Public Prosecutions that he had no further
evidence to offer against them. Lord Lane acquitted them and the Home Secretary
appeared at the Dispatch Box to make a statement on the acquittal.
I
am glad to follow the hon. Member for Islington, North (Mr. Corbyn), who is the only Labour Back-Bench Member to get up
and debate the issue, which I think is one of great importance. As I have told
him before, I am aware of how seriously he takes these issues and I respect the
way in which he deals with them—even though, as he knows, there is quite
a gulf between our attitudes.
In the same Sky/Channel Four ‘debate’, Mrs May insisted
the Conservatives had increased the support for the police and the anti-terror apparatus
of government. But a memorandum sub mitted to the Home Affairs Select
Committee just a month ago, states the exact opposite, as is
detailed below:
Resource DEL by Estimate section
|
£m
|
||||||||
Estimate Section
|
2017-18 Main Estimate
|
2016-17 Supplementary Estimate
|
Change
|
Change (%)
|
|||||
Crime Policing & Fire Group
|
8,514.7
|
8,366.0
|
148.7
|
1.8%
|
|||||
Office for Security and Counter Terrorism
|
824.5
|
856.3
|
-31.8
|
-3.7%
|
|||||
Immigration Enforcement
|
410.7
|
422.3
|
-11.6
|
-2.8%
|
|||||
UK Visas & Immigration
|
-497.6
|
-517.9
|
20.3
|
-3.9%
|
|||||
International & Immigration Policy
|
57.4
|
142.8
|
-85.4
|
-59.8%
|
|||||
Border Force
|
552.3
|
500.2
|
52.1
|
10.4%
|
|||||
HM Passport Office
|
-146.2
|
-149.8
|
3.6
|
-2.4%
|
|||||
Enablers
|
696.0
|
831.7
|
-135.7
|
-16.3%
|
|||||
Arms Length Bodies (Net)
|
94.4
|
121.3
|
-26.9
|
-22.2%
|
|||||
European Solidarity Mechanism (Net)
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0%
|
|||||
DUP
|
4.1
|
0.0
|
4.1
|
||||||
Resource DEL
|
10,510.4
|
10,573.1
|
-62.7
|
-0.6%
|
|||||
Resource DEL (Programme) by Estimate section
|
£m
|
||||||||
Estimate Section
|
2017-18 Main Estimate
|
2016-17 Supplementary Estimate
|
Change
|
Change (%)
|
|||||
Crime Policing & Fire Group
|
8,456.2
|
8,325.9
|
130.3
|
1.56%
|
|||||
Office for Security and Counter Terrorism
|
779.1
|
809.7
|
-30.6
|
-3.78%
|
|||||
Immigration Enforcement
|
403.7
|
416.1
|
-12.4
|
-2.98%
|
|||||
UK Visas & Immigration
|
-511.1
|
-535.5
|
24.4
|
-4.56%
|
|||||
International & Immigration Policy
|
34.4
|
120.6
|
-86.2
|
-71.48%
|
|||||
Border Force
|
549.4
|
498.5
|
50.9
|
10.21%
|
|||||
HM Passport Office
|
-145.8
|
-135.4
|
-10.4
|
7.68%
|
|||||
Enablers
|
502.6
|
619.7
|
-117.1
|
-18.9%
|
|||||
Arms Length Bodies (Net)
|
94.4
|
100.8
|
-6.4
|
-6.35%
|
|||||
European Solidarity Mechanism (Net)
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.00%
|
|||||
DUP
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
||||||
Resource DEL Programme
|
10,163.0
|
10,220.6
|
-57.6
|
-0.56%
|
|||||
Capital DEL by Estimate section
|
£m
|
||||||||
Estimate Section
|
2017-18 Main Estimate
|
2016-17 Supplementary Estimate
|
Change
|
Change (%)
|
|||||
Crime Policing & Fire Group
|
151.6
|
82.3
|
69.3
|
84.1%
|
|||||
Office for Security and Counter Terrorism
|
122.0
|
105.5
|
16.5
|
15.7%
|
|||||
Immigration Enforcement
|
18.4
|
3.1
|
15.3
|
491.9%
|
|||||
UK Visas & Immigration
|
76.3
|
0.0
|
76.3
|
||||||
International & Immigration Policy
|
0.7
|
0.7
|
0.0
|
0.0%
|
|||||
Border Force
|
71.4
|
70.8
|
0.6
|
0.8%
|
|||||
HM Passport Office
|
14.5
|
14.3
|
0.2
|
1.4%
|
|||||
Enablers
|
50.6
|
183.0
|
-132.4
|
-72.4%
|
|||||
Arms Length Bodies (Net)
|
10.5
|
22.2
|
-11.7
|
-52.7%
|
|||||
DUP
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
||||||
Capital DEL
|
515.9
|
481.9
|
34.0
|
7.1%
|
|||||
AME by Estimate section
|
£m
|
||||||||
Estimate Section
|
2017-18 Main Estimate
|
2016-17 Supplementary Estimate
|
Change
|
Change (%)
|
|||||
AME Charges
|
4.9
|
82.9
|
-78.0
|
-94.1%
|
|||||
o/w
|
|||||||||
Crime Policing & Fire Group
|
4.9
|
82.9
|
-78.0
|
-94.1%
|
|||||
Police and Fire Superannuation
|
2,493.0
|
2,351.9
|
141.0
|
6.0%
|
|||||
AME Charges Arms Length Bodies (Net)
|
0.0
|
38.0
|
-38.0
|
-100%
|
|||||
Resource AME
|
2,497.8
|
2,472.8
|
25.0
|
1.0%
|
|||||
Police and Fire Superannuation
|
0.0
|
3.1
|
-3.1
|
-100%
|
|||||
Capital AME
|
0.0
|
3.1
|
|||||||
Estimates Memoranda
·
Home Office Main Estimates 2017-18 -
Memorandum ( PDF
519.2 KB)Published 25 April 2017
HOME OFFICE MAIN ESTIMATE 2017-18:
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
Introduction
The primary purpose of this Memorandum is
to provide the Committee with an overview of the changes between the final
position for 2016-17, as shown below and the opening position for 2017-18, as
shown in the Main Estimate.
The Main Estimate reflects the priorities
agreed between the Home Office and Treasury in the 2015 Spending Review
settlement and subsequent fiscal events.
No comments:
Post a Comment