The Energy
Editor of The Guardian newspaper
today published a very encouraging story, revealing renewable energy technology sources provided
more electricity to UK homes and businesses than fossil fuels for the first
time over the last quarter, according to new research by independent group Carbon Brief.
She pointed out
that “It is the first time that electricity from British windfarms, solar
panels and renewable biomass plants has surpassed fossil fuels since the UK’s
first power plant fired up in 1882.”
But then she
added the following sentence; “The new milestone confirms predictions made by
National Grid that 2019 will be the first
year since the Industrial Revolution that zero-carbon electricity –
renewables and nuclear – overtakes gas and coal-fired power.”
This is where
the article begins to mislead: nuclear power does not generate “zero carbon
electricity.” It has a significant carbon footprint – from the mining of
uranium for the fuel, to final radioactive waste disposal and decommissioning
of the nuclear plant and associated facilities.
(“Renewable
electricity overtakes fossil fuels in UK for first time,” 14 October 2019; https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/14/renewable-electricity-overtakes-fossil-fuels-in-uk-for-first-time)
Two Oxford University Professors, Felix Hofmann
(Department of Engineering Science, and David Armstrong (Department of
Materials) were also reported today to have both been awarded Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRC
grants worth a total of £1 million to work with US partners (who will receive
similar funding from the US-based Nuclear Engineering University Partnership
Program.)
Professor Hofmann commented “For successful decarbonisation by the 2050s, new build of future fission reactors in the UK is urgently needed.”
(EPSRC grants for nuclear fission reactor Machinery Market, 13 October 2019 http://www.machinery-market.co.uk/news/25081/EPSRC-grants-for-nuclear-fission-reactor
Professor Hofmann commented “For successful decarbonisation by the 2050s, new build of future fission reactors in the UK is urgently needed.”
(EPSRC grants for nuclear fission reactor Machinery Market, 13 October 2019 http://www.machinery-market.co.uk/news/25081/EPSRC-grants-for-nuclear-fission-reactor
The atomic mafia have a strong grip on dissembling with the myth that nuclear has a meaningful role in decarbonising electricity generation.
Last week The Guardian began publishing its major investigatory
series on The [Carbon] Polluters (10-12 October; https://www.theguardian.com/environment/series/the-polluters).
However, in the analysis
of MPs voting record on ways to mitigate climate change (“Tories five times as
likely as other MPs to vote against bills to tackle climate change,” 12 October,
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/11/tory-mps-five-times-more-likely-to-vote-against-climate-action)
both Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Green Party MP Caroline Lucas are marked
down to 92% supportive voting on the basis they voted to “keep nuclear power
subsidies relatively low.”
This clearly implies
that voting for higher nuclear subsidies would increase their score on
mitigating carbon emissions.
The International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA)’s Acting Director General, Cornel Feruta, reflected this
viewpoint in his opening remarks to a week-long
international conference, on Climate
Change and the Role of Nuclear Power at the IAEA - the UN agency that
promotes nuclear energy – held last week in Vienna, asserting: "It is
difficult to see how the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions can be
achieved without a significant increase in the use of nuclear power in the
coming decades."( (www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/statement-at-the-international-conference-on-climate-change-and-the-role-of-nuclear-power)
But it is a demonstrably misguided
viewpoint.
A recent, comprehensive Life Cycle
Assessments (LCAs) of greenhouse gas emissions from differing power generation
technologies by Mark Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering
at Stanford University, California, indicates that nuclear CO2 emissions are
between 10 to 18 times greater than
those from renewables. (https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/ReviewSolGW09.pdf)
In a newly completed chapter ‘Evaluation of Nuclear Power as a Proposed Solution to Global Warming, Air
Pollution, and Energy Security’, by Prof Jacobson in a forthcoming
energy book, 100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for
Everything https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/WWSBook/WWSBook.html) he argues cogently:
“There is no such thing as a zero-
or close-to-zero emission nuclear power plant. Even existing plants emit due to
the continuous mining and refining of uranium needed for the plant. …Overall
emissions from new nuclear are 78 to178g of CO2/kWH, not close to
0.”
All MPs need to take note.
No comments:
Post a Comment