Thursday, 17 July 2014

How UK armed Assad

I submitted this letter to the Independent, but they declined to publish it.
 
The small article  on page 22 of your newspaper on 10 July reported that in the early 1980s chemicals exported to Syria could have been subsequently diverted for use by the autocratic Assad regime in the nerve gas Sarin (“UK chemicals could have been used in Syrian sarin”).
Unfortunately, it is not only over thirty years ago that the UK has licensed the export of chemicals and technologies with dual civil and military end uses. There is a distressing list of more contemporary exports.

 
 
Licences
 

Date
Type
Country
Item
Revoked
Rating
Value
2011-09
 
 
£997
£1,001
 
 
 
 
 
2011-02
 
£12,020
2010-12
 
£12,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010-07
 
£10,167
 
 
 
 
 
2010-06
 
 
N/A
Unknown
2010-05
 
£345
2010-05
 
£17,038
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010-02
 
 
£197,732
2010-01
2011-05
 ML3
£30,000
2009-11
 
 
£1,515,000
£900,000
2009-10
 
 
£2,451
 
 
 
 
 
2009-09
 
£22,139
 
 
 
 
 
2009-08
 
£1,250,000
2009-08
 
£1,250,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009-06
 
£540
 
 
 
 
 
 

Date
Type
Country
Item
Revoked
Rating
Value
 
 
 
 
 
2009-04Refused(1)
 chemicals  
 
N/A
2009-03Refused(1)
 
 
N/A
2009-02
 
£6,220
2008-12
 
£41,900
2008-10
 
 
£44,187
2008-10
 
 
 
 ML13
£5,040
2008-09Refused(1)
 
N/A
2008-08
 
 ML3
£30,000
2008-08
 
£212,430
2008-08
 
£26,430
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008-05
 
£14,027
 
 
 
 
 
[ SIEL= Standard Individual Export Licence;
OIEL=Open Individual Export License] 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I think the Foreign Secretary and his Labour predecessors should explain to the public why they gave permission for such materials and technologies to be exported to a regime led by such a political thug.

No comments:

Post a Comment