Monday, 27 June 2016

London Mayor out of touch with realities of EU membership‏

Letter to the London  Evening Standard:

I voted to remain.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan wrote on Friday in the immediate aftermath of the Referendum vote "I will be pushing the Government  to ensure remaining in the single market is a cornerstone  of the negotiations with the EU  over the months ahead," 'Don't panic- London will continue to be a great successful city,'24 June).
Given that at the moment there is no identifiable Government to lobby, so that makes it difficult. But Mr Khan's proposition is also illogical.
It seems  very clear one of the big reasons the majority voted for BREXIT is their concerns over uncontrolled inward migration. It is not possible to  be in the Single Market for trade in goods and services without agreeing to  the free movement of labour. As a lawyer and former minister, surely Mr Khan  must know this.
And there is absolutely no prospect of the other 27 EU governments agreeing to the UK having the benefits of  participation in the Single Market without abiding by its  core rules.
Think again Mr Mayor!

Labour MP Paul Flynn asks questions on who will be our nuclear watchdog

This important article was published yesterday:

Paul Flynn asks question on who will be our nuclear watchdog
Wales on Sunday, June 26 2016
THE regulation of nuclear power stations in Britain has been thrown into doubt by the UK vote to leave the European Union.
Newport West Labour MP Paul Flynn has tabled parliamentary questions to Energy Secretary Amber Rudd, seeking to clarify what will happen to international inspections in a pro-Brexit scenario.
Dr David Lowry, a nuclear expert and an adviser to Mr Flynn, said: “As a member of the EU, the UK is also a member of the European Atomic Energy Community, usually abbreviated to Euratom, headquartered in Luxembourg.
“Euratom has both a supply agency, to provide nuclear fuel and co-ordinate uranium supplies – a sort of multiple five-year Soviet-style nuclear supply plan – for EU member states; and, importantly, Euratom also implements safeguards on nuclear materials and at nuclear plants to verify the UK has not diverted such materials or facilities to military misuse.
“Euratom also does basic radiation protection and reactor safety and nuclear waste management research and development via the EU Joint Research Centres, for which the UK provides annual multi-million-pound donations to the EU.”
The EU Treaty – the document which sets the rules for EU agencies – says one of the main functions of Euratom is to establish uniform safety standards to protect the health of workers and the general public and ensure they are applied.
Each member state is required to provide the European Commission with the general data relating to any plan for the disposal of nuclear waste.
At the same time, the assent of the Commission is required where these plans are liable to affect the territories of other member states.
But, said Dr Lowry, all this will end as the UK withdraws.
There is a UK safety ( and security)  regulator called the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), but it is funded by the nuclear industry and reports to the UK Government.
Euratom inspects the Wylfa nuclear power station on Anglesey.
A quarterly report produced by ONR in September 2015 stated: “During a Euratom inspection of radioactive sources with nuclear material it was discovered that there were two items that were not declared to Euratom but should have been as they contained nuclear material.
“Uranyl Nitrate and Thorium Nitrate were both being held in the redundant bonded source store.
“The inspector requested these items be reported in the next Inventory Change Report as accidental arisings.
“This incident relates to another find of nuclear material. About a year ago Wylfa reported the find of some small radioactive sources. These were brought onto the inventory.
“Euratom wanted to verify these sources during the recent Physical Inventory Verification.
“During this verification the Euratom inspector found another two items in the source store cupboard.
“Subsequent investigation of source stores inside and outside the reactor building has not found any other undeclared items.”
Dr Lowry said: “The unaddressed question is who will replace Euratom in the nuclear safeguards inspections, as the International Atomic Energy Agency, based in Vienna, which undertakes this role for countries outside the EU, is already under-resourced and overstretched, with Iran, North Korea, and other dodgy nuclear nations to keep an eye on.
“So what is going to happen? Who will act as the UK’s atomic watchdog?” 

Thursday, 23 June 2016

How public broadcasters let down electorate in referendum campaign


In the wake of the EU referendum result, our public broadcasters, led by the BBC and Channel Four, especially its flagship news programme Channel Four News, will hold an inquest and analysis of how they covered the whole referendum campaign.  And I think both have a lot of searching questions to ask of their approach, which followed an increasingly narrow agenda, based on the political outpourings of the self-appointed leadership of the official ‘Remain’ and ‘Leave’ campaigns, and buttressed by the less than impartial and ever-more-poisonous political reportage of the right wing press: The Sun, The Daily Mail ; The Daily Telegraph, and The Times; along with pernicious ramblings of right wing web sites, social media sites and twitter feeds

All of this has been done over several months with barely any interview with, or  mention of the political views and assessments of any MEPs,  or their political groupings in the European Parliament, except for those from UKIP, such as Nigel Farage.

There has been, as a result, a significant omission of several important issues that really ought to have been examined, the most important of which is the environment and the merits of EU-based environmental regulations in the UK. Of the interviews with political leaders and debates held during the referendum campaign, the only two instances I can recall when environmental, climate change or energy issues were raised were by Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Amber Rudd, in the big TV debate in which she personally verbally assaulted Bris Johnson, and by Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, in his question and answer with young professionals on Sky News.

The big set piece debates on BBC, hosted by David Dimbleby, and Channel Four, hosted by Jeremy Paxman, had the issues for discussion pre-determined by the broadcasters, and excluded any discussion of the environment.

In the print media, the environment has barely fared any better. Green MP Caroline Lucas and John Ashton ( who served from 2006 to 2012 as special representative for climate change for three British foreign secretaries) did jointly publish an article on the important role the EU has played in international climate change negotiations, and subsequent policy implementation, (“If we’re to win the climate struggle, we must remain in Europe,” The Guardian, 13 June 2016, –but even this never made the print edition, solely appearing on the Guardian web site.

The same newspaper has carried a limited number of letters from readers addressing EU-related environmental issues, such as from Labour MEP Seb Dance – a member of the European parliament environment committee (“6:23 AM - 22 Jun 2016 · Details

The European Union’s record on clean beaches and dirty air,” Guardian letters, Monday 6 June 2016,,in which he argued :

“The coalition of rightwing politicians backing Brexit consists of climate change deniers, environmentalist cynics and no-holds-barred free-marketeers. For George Eustice to claim the UK’s environment will be top of a list of priorities if Britain decides to leave the European Union is, frankly, ridiculous (Minister attacks ‘spirit-crushing’ green directives, 31 May).

The big environmental challenges the UK faces – air pollution, catastrophic climate change, fish stocks, the hunting of migratory birds – do not respect national borders and can only be tackled collectively.”

“When it comes to our environment Thursday’s vote could be the most pivotal democratic moment in a generation.A decision to leave the EU and the single market will undermine not just the environmental protections we have already created, but also our ability to work together with others to build on them to end the health risks of air pollution, avoid the risks of climate change and protect our green spaces.It’s not about fear, but about our ability to create a better world.”

He added : “And it’s not just the rules themselves, the EU is also about ensuring all nations follow democratic processes.As a result companies must carry out impact assessments, regulators and local authorities must consult communities and firms must take liability if things go wrong. Leaving the EU then returns power over things like consultation to Whitehall.”

But these arguments have barely found any place in our public broadcasters’ coverage of the referendum campaign.

Three days before the referendum vote, British ministers attended a meeting of EU environment ministers in Brussels:  Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Rory Stewart ( not the Secretary of State, Liz Truss) represented the UK, supported by  Roseanna Cunningham, Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform for the Scottish Government.


I doubt more than a few dozen of the 66 million UK population knew this meeting ever took place, yet such meeting are crucial in formulating more sustainable environment for the EU’s 570 million citizens. So here are the details, as published by the European Council  web site.
It is a pity voters have been left in ignorance over the importance of EU environmental issues by our narrow-minded public broadcasters.


Environment Council, 20/06/2016

Council of the EU

·         Council of the European Union
·         Meeting n°3476
·         Luxembourg
·         20/06/2016

·         List of participants

Press information

20/06/2016 - Press release

18:00 Council conclusions on the EU action plan for the circular economy On 20 June the Council adopted conclusions on the action plan for a circular economy.

20/06/2016 - Press release

The Council adopted a statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement, the global legally-binding agreement on climate change adopted in December 2015.

Main results

Highlights of the Environment Council, held on 20 June 2016 in Luxembourg


Ministers discussed climate change issues as well as air quality, circular economy and the fight against wildlife trafficking

Climate change

The Council adopted a statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement. The global legally-binding agreement on climate change was adopted in December 2015 in Paris. It will enter into force after ratification by 55 countries representing at least 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

"With this statement we want to send a clear political message on the EU's commitment to address climate change. We are determined to ratify the Paris agreement as soon as possible and to work for effective implementation of the deal."

Sharon Dijksma, Dutch Minister for the Environment

The Council adopted a statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement, the global legally-binding agreement on climate change adopted in December 2015


The Council adopted a statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement, the global legally-binding agreement on climate change adopted in December 2015

Meeting information

·         Outcome of the Council meeting

·         Background brief

Dutch Minister for the Environment and President of the Environment Council, Sharon Dijksma, said: "With this statement we want to send a clear political message on the EU's commitment to address climate change. We are determined to ratify the Paris agreement as soon as possible and to work for effective implementation of the deal".

Ministers also took note of the presentation by the Commission of the proposal for the conclusion of the Paris Agreement by the EU.

Furthermore, they held a policy debate on the review of one of EU's main tools to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change: the emissions trading system (ETS).

Air quality

Ministers took stock of discussions on new rules and limits for air pollutants, the so-called NEC directive. The presidency informed ministers of the state of play of negotiations with the European Parliament.

Circular economy

The Council adopted conclusions on the action plan for a circular economy. This plan aims to reduce waste and keep the value of products, materials and resources in the economy for as long as possible. The conclusions support this aim and demonstrate commitment to this transition towards a more sustainable model, for instance by cutting resource use, boosting recycling and better managing waste.

Wildlife trafficking

The Council adopted conclusions supporting the EU's action plan against wildlife trafficking. The Council expressed deep concern about the increase in illegal wildlife trafficking and its detrimental effect on biodiversity and sustainable development.  The conclusions call on all actors to step up efforts to combat this crime.

Live streaming, videos and photos

Council conclusions on the EU action plan for the circular economy

Council of the EU

·         20/06/2016
·         18:00
·         Press release
·         367/16
·         Environment

·         Enterprise and industry

20/06/2016 | 18:00

Press contacts

Ester Arauzo-Azofra
Press officer
+32 22815361
+32 473630723

The Council adopted conclusions on the action plan for a circular economy. This plan aims to reduce waste and keep the value of products, materials and resources in the economy for as long as possible. The conclusions support this aim and demonstrate commitment to this transition towards a more sustainable model, for instance by cutting resource use, boosting recycling and better managing waste.

"Council conclusions on Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy

The Council of the European Union,


·         The Europe 2020 Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth adopted by the European Council on 17 June 2010, and its Flagship Initiative “A Resource-Efficient Europe”; 

·         The Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 "Living well, within the limits of our planet" (7th EAP)[1] for a resource-efficient, green and competitive low-carbon economy; 

·         The Report of the European Parliament on “Resource Efficiency: moving towards a Circular Economy”[2]

·         The UNGA resolution of 25 September 2015 on "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" and The Climate Agreement (COP 21 Paris);  

·         The Commission's Communications “Innovating for Sustainable Growth - A Bioeconomy for Europe”[3]; The Eco-innovation Action Plan[4]; Green Action Plan for SMEs[5] and the Green Employment Initiative[6] ; Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector[7]; A Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources[8]; Digitizing the European industry, reaping the full benefits of a digital single market and related communications[9]; Raw Materials Initiative[10];

·         The Council conclusions on 

            - Sustainable materials management and sustainable production and consumption[11];
            - Greening the European Semester and the Europe 2020 Strategy[12];
            - The Commission's Communication “A Roadmap to a Resource-Efficient Europe”[13][14];
            - The Mid-Term Review of the EU-Biodiversity Strategy 2020[15] ;
            - The mainstreaming of industrial competitiveness[16].

UNDERSTANDING that a Circular Economy offers great potential to achieve sustainable growth and boost the EU's competitiveness, create jobs, decrease the EU's dependency on non-renewable primary raw materials, achieve resource and energy efficiency and a smaller environmental footprint, promote locally produced goods, prevent and minimise waste generation, protect nature and natural capital, strengthen ecological resilience and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, thus contributing to the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development and the world-wide efforts towards a green economy, while maintaining well-being within the limits of our planet and protection of human health and the environment;

UNDERLINES the importance of  the waste hierarchy in supporting the transition to the Circular Economy, starting with an increase in prevention, preparation for reuse and recycling of waste, and minimizing waste disposal, in particular through a significant reduction of landfilled waste.


1.       WELCOMES the Commission Communication of 2 December 2015 on "Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy"[17] (hereinafter referred to as the "Action Plan") and COMMITS to supporting its implementation with a view to facilitating the transition to a circular economy;

2.       UNDERLINES that the transition to a Circular Economy requires long-term commitment and action, in a wide range of policy areas in the EU, and at all levels of government in Member States; ENCOURAGES Member States to establish and adopt measures and/or strategies to complement and contribute to the EU Action Plan; URGES the Commission to fully integrate the Circular Economy in all its relevant policies and strategies; further RECOGNISES that with a view to accelerating the transition, the different conditions and stages in Member States should be taken into account;

3.       CONSIDERS the active involvement of the private sector and other stakeholders across Europe and at the global level a key element for a successful and more effective transition towards a Circular Economy; ENCOURAGES the EU and the Member States, at all levels of government, to actively engage the private sector to promote cooperation, innovation and industrial symbiosis projects within and across sectors and value chains; including by addressing specific challenges in the transition to the Circular Economy, through agreements between stakeholders in society and governments such as the pilot on voluntary “Innovation Deals”[18];

4.       CALLS upon the Commission to ensure that proposals flowing from the Action Plan are accompanied by a thorough Impact Assessment; and UNDERLINES that policy measures need to support sustainable development and the long-term competitiveness of EU industry, with a particular reference to SMEs, and improve the functioning of the Internal Market; FURTHER UNDERLINES that policy measures need to be in line with the principles of Better Law-Making as set out in the inter-institutional agreement of 13 April 2016[19], be proportional, cost-effective, socially acceptable, easy to adopt with minimal administrative burden, avoid policy fragmentation to create synergies, take into account existing national legislation that stimulates circularity, and initiatives that stimulate consistent and coherent EU legislation such as the Make-it-Work project;

5.       UNDERLINES the need to ascertain sustainable sourcing and supply of primary raw materials; EMPHASISES the role of fair trade, in ensuring that prices of primary raw materials and products reflect their environmental and social externalities, and that, where relevant, healthy competition between the market for primary and secondary resources is facilitated; CALLS upon the Commission to take concrete initatiatives to promote sustainable sourcing and supply of raw materials within the EU and in cooperation with third (commodity producing) countries, without creating tariff or non-tariff trade barriers;


6.       SUPPORTS the Commission's approach in the Action Plan to address the entire life cycle of products and STRESSES that such an integrated, cross-sectoral approach is essential to effectively 'close the loop' and achieve a transition to a Circular Economy where the value of products, materials and resources is maintained in the economy for as long as possible, and the generation of waste minimised; ENCOURAGES the Commission and the Member States to create an enabling and coherent policy environment and legislative framework for systemic innovation to promote a circular economy throughout the value chain, including opportunities to experiment with such innovations.

7.       UNDERLINES the importance of a coherent product policy framework at the EU level, in line with the 7th Environmental Action Programme calling for action by 2020; WELCOMES the Commission's intention to work towards this; STRONGLY ENCOURAGES the Commission to ensure coherence, enhancement and effectiveness of existing EU instruments relevant for product policy; INVITES the Commission to ensure that policy instruments can facilitate systemic innovations in the future;

8.       STRESSES the need to ensure that products are designed and produced more sustainably, taking into account their full life cycle and minimising negative impact on the environment and on human health; in this context; NOTES with concern that the Commission has failed to meet the timetable indicated in the annex to the action plan for actions regarding eco-design; REQUESTS the Commission to follow-up on these actions without further delay; URGES the Commission to include appropriate measures to improve the durability, reparability, reusability, possibilities to use recycled materials, upgradability and recyclability of products in the EU Ecodesign regulations, and other legislation as appropriate, before 2020; INVITES the Commission to evaluate before the end of 2018 for which product groups, other than energy related, it would be possible to take better into account resource efficiency and impact on the environment and human health, building on experiences from the Ecodesign directive;

9.       STRESSES the need for action at European level to extend the lifetime of products, including by addressing planned obsolescence; INVITES the Commission to develop common methods for assessing and verifying product life time; NOTES the Commission's proposal on online sales of goods; LOOKS FORWARD to discussing the possibilities to extend the legal guarantee of all sales of goods  on the basis of this proposal and the ongoing fitness check of the EU consumer and marketing law; INVITES the Commission to investigate what other initiatives can be taken at the EU level in the interest of extending the lifetime of products, for instance by promoting the availability of spare parts;

10.     NOTING the crucial role of consumers in the transition to a Circular Economy; EMPHASISES the importance of raising awareness, promoting appropriate market based mechanisms and developing supportive infrastructure, in order to boost sustainable behavior, consumption and production, both in Business to Consumer and Business to Business markets; STRESSES that access to reliable, timely and understandable information regarding the environmental characteristics of products and services can help make informed choices; CALLS upon the Commission to develop and propose a methodology to ensure that environmental claims, including labels, are based on verifiable and transparent information, taking into account specific conditions in Member States and the lessons learnt from the ongoing European pilots on the environmental footprint and Environmental Technologies Verification; ENCOURAGES the Commission and the Member States to support awareness raising activities directed at consumers in promoting the Circular Economy;

11.     EMPHASISES the importance of a well-functioning chemicals legislation to support the Circular Economy and the need to fulfil the various goals in the 7th Environmental Action Programme; CALLS upon the Commission, when addressing the interface between EU chemicals, products and waste legislation by 2017, to develop, in cooperation with the Member States, a methodology to determine whether recycling, recovery or disposal provides the best overall outcome to achieve both non-toxic material cycles and increased recycling rates, while respecting the existing high level of protection of human health and the environment and taking into account the precautionary principle; in this context, EMPHASISES the need for adequate information on the presence of substances of very high concern in materials, products and waste;

12.     STRESSES the importance of a well functioning and efficient market for secondary raw materials; UNDERLINES the importance of stimulating demand for secondary raw materials and high quality recycling by, inter alia, promoting the use of secondary raw materials and improving the confidence in the quality of secondary raw materials including accessibility of information regarding the content of substances which pose problems to recycling or recovery; CALLS upon the Commission to develop uniform EU end of waste criteria where appropriate, and to promote the development of EU and international quality standards for secondary raw materials, in order to facilitate cross border movement, while safeguarding the environment and human health;

13.     CALLS upon the Commission to explore possibilities to encourage that used products that are exported from the EU will be recycled in an environmentally sound and safe manner once they become waste inside or outside the EU;

13a    RECOGNISES that export of waste can make it harder to achieve higher recycling rates; CALLS for reinforcement of controls within the EU and at its borders to prevent illegal transport of waste, in line with the revised waste shipment regulation[20].

14.     REITERATES the need for preventing marine litter, and in particular plastics, from ending up in the environment in order to achieve a significant reduction by 2020; CONSIDERS eco-design of plastic and plastic products, as well as sound management of plastic waste essential for pollution prevention; WELCOMES the voluntary initiatives taken by industry; CALLS upon the Commission to propose robust measures to reduce discharge of macro- and micro-sized plastic debris in the marine environment as part of the announced plastic strategy by 2017 at the latest, including a proposal for a ban on micro-plastic particles in cosmetics, and proposals to address other products generating marine litter as appropriate, while taking into account developments within regional sea conventions like OSPAR, HELCOM and Barcelona;

15.     EMPHASISES the contribution of efficient water use to a Circular Economy; in this regard STRESSES the importance of integrated water management as well as, enhanced and cost-effective recycling and reuse of water taking into account regional conditions, and recycling of resources in waste water, in line with the EU environmental acquis; CALLS upon the Commission to ensure that the legislative framework supports, where appropriate, the reuse of treated wastewater while respecting the existing high level of protection to human health and the environment[21];

16.     SUPPORTS efforts of all actors to reduce food waste, which will contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 12.3, which aims at halving per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer level, and reducing food losses along production and supply chains including post-harvest losses by 2030;


17.     EMPHASISES that research and innovation are essential to develop the necessary sustainable and resource efficient industrial, economic and societal processes to stimulate the transition to the Circular Economy; CALLS upon the Commission to support the EU industry in research and innovation, in improving cross-cycle and cross-sectoral cooperation, and in taking up new technologies and business models, digital solutions, more resource-efficient services, products and production processes and better alternatives for hazardous chemicals and materials in terms of human health and environmental protection;

18.     ACKNOWLEDGES the benefits of natural capital, the importance of ecosystems and their services and the need for sustainable use of natural resources; RECALLS the importance of developing a system of valuation of natural capital through appropriate indicators for monitoring economic progress and further developing ecosystem accounts while making the best use of existing sustainability instruments and initiatives; INVITES the Commission and the Member States to promote nature- and bio-based solutions, the use of sustainably sourced renewable materials, including the bio-refining of biomass to high value purposes without compromising food security and environmental integrity, resource efficiency, the resilience of ecosystems and their services and the sustainable use of renewables; TAKES NOTE of the Commission's intention to promote efficient use of bio-based resources through a series of measures including guidance and dissemination of best practices on the cascading use of biomass and support for innovation in the bioeconomy; REQUESTS the Commission to examine the contribution of its Bio-economy Strategy 2012 to the Circular Economy and update it accordingly;

19.     REITERATES that a circular economy not only requires investment in sustainable and innovative solutions, but also green public expenditure in order to mobilise public and private sector initiatives; in this regard WELCOMES the available support and increased focus for circular economy in EU funds and financial programmes; CALLS upon the Commission to actively support the Member States, the private sector and other stakeholders to use these funds, to facilitate the transition to a Circular Economy by improving resource and energy efficiency and minimising waste, including through application of the waste hierarchy; ENCOURAGES the Commission and Member-States to apply the Polluter Pays Principle to cover the costs of the necessary waste management infrastructure in a sustainable manner;

20.     UNDERLINES that government has a key role to play in creating incentives and ensuring effective application of Green Public Procurement (GPP) towards the Circular Economy; CALLS upon the Commission and Member States to stimulate and facilitate circular business models that enable an increased share of green public procurement in the public expenditure at all levels possible, to create markets for circular products and services; REQUESTS the Commission to develop guidance and incentives for the application of GPP for Circular Economy including on application of life cycle costing; CALLS upon the Commission and Member States to build on existing targets[22] for GPP, to accelerate the transition to the Circular Economy, to improve monitoring, and to actively facilitate exchange of knowledge and best practices between Member States, and to provide support for GPP training schemes;

21.     RECOGNIZES that SMEs, while often drivers of innovation and at the forefront of the transition to a Circular Economy, face specific challenges; SUPPORTS measures to enhance the possibilities of SMEs to profit from opportunities which the transition to a Circular Economy presents, as well as support SMEs to adapt and contribute to the transition to a Circular Economy; WELCOMES the contribution of the Eco-Innovation Action Plan and the Green Action Plan for SMEs to the transition towards a Circular Economy;

22.     STRESSES the importance of education and training in all relevant fields to facilitate the transition to the Circular Economy and ensure that it contributes to reducing unemployment while creating high quality jobs;


23.     STRESSES the need for a governance structure at EU level and a monitoring framework to strenghten and assess the progress towards circular economy, while minimising the administrative burden; in this respect, NOTES information is already reported to Eurostat; CALLS upon the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to continue to develop a dashboard of reliable indicators in view of formulating ambitious and realistic targets[23] with a long-term horizon, and integrating these with a follow-up of the EU 2020 Strategy, and the EU implementation of the 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development;

24.     EMPHASIZES that it is important to keep progress made with the Action Plan under regular review at political level; REQUESTS the Commission to provide the Council with an annual written update on the progress made on the implementation of the action plan; and REQUESTS the Commission to regularly, starting by 2018, evaluate the effect of the implemented actions in line with the better regulation principles, inter alia by consulting stakeholders in order to include their practical experiences, with a view to taking stock of results of the action plan, ascertaining the most effective set of policies and when necessary updating the plan and its proposed instruments;

25.     NOTES that stakeholders have inter alia called for a long-term focus and strong guidance and ownership by the EU and the Member States[24], CALLS for consistency in national approaches and standards, exchange of best practices and lessons learned by Member States and stakeholders, and more financial incentives and market-based instruments to stimulate reuse and the market for secondary raw materials;

26.     UNDERLINES the importance of market based instruments where approriate, to create economic incentives that stimulate the sustainable use of resources; CALLS upon the Member States to exchange experiences and best practices in the development and use of market-based instruments supporting the transition to the Circular Economy and take into account the impact of certain market-based instruments on neighbouring Member-States; WELCOMES guidance from the Commission on how Member States could develop such instruments in support of the Circular Economy; RECOGNISES the detrimental impact of environmentally harmful subsidies; CALLS upon the Commission to develop in cooperation with the Member States EU guidance for environmentally harmful subsidies to facilitate efforts in identifying and phasing out such subsidies, while taking into account social and economic aspects;

27.     CALLS upon the Commission to set up a platform to facilitate more structural exchange of knowledge, technologies, good practices and policy experiences (including on economic instruments) between Member States, and between stakeholders at European level, making use, where possible, of existing platforms and experiences."

[1]        OJ L 354 of 28 December 2013, p. 171
[2]        (2014)2208 (INI)
[3]        6487/12 - COM(2012) 60 final
[4]        18874/11 - COM(2011) 899 final
[5]        11616/1/14 REV 1 - COM(2014) 440 final
[6]        11572/14 - COM(2014) 446 final
[7]        11609/14 - COM(2014) 445 final
[8]        16425/12 - COM(2012) 673 final
[9]         8100/16 - COM(2016) 180 final
[9]         8097/16 - COM(2016) 179 final
[9]         8099/16 - COM(2016) 178 final
[9]         8104/16 - COM(2016) 178 final
[10]       16053/08 - COM(2008) 699 final
[11]       17495/10
[12]       14731/14
[13]       18346/11
[14]       6678/12
[15]       15389/15
[16]       13617/14
[17]       14972/15
[18]       'Better regulations for innovation-driven investment at EU level' (SWD(2015) 298; and
[19]       OJ L123/1 (12.5.2016)
[20]       Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 on shipments of waste, as last amended by Regulation (EU) No 660/2014
[21]       Inter alia, on the basis of opinions of the  European Food Safety Authority
[22]       In line with 7th EAP, and based on the experiences in the Energy Efficiency Directive
[23]       Building on the Council conclusions on Greening the European Semester and the Europe 2020 Strategy (14731/14);

Council statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement

Council of the EU

·         20/06/2016
·         17:40
·         Press release
·         360/16
·         Environment

·         Energy

20/06/2016 | 17:40

Press contacts

Ester Arauzo-Azofra
Press officer
+32 22815361
+32 473630723

The Council adopted a statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement, the global legally-binding agreement on climate change adopted in December 2015


The Council adopted a statement on the ratification of the Paris Agreement, the global legally-binding agreement on climate change adopted in December 2015

"The Council recalls that in December 2015 a historic outcome was reached in Paris when the world adopted the first-ever truly global and legally-binding climate agreement including by (a) holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, (b) increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and (c) making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilient development.

The Council recalls that the Paris Agreement emphasizes the intrinsic relationship that climate change action, responses, and impact have with equitable access to sustainable development and the eradication of poverty, recognizes the fundamental priority of safeguarding food security and ending hunger, and notes the importance of the integrity of all ecosystems and the protection of biodiversity including forests.

The Council recalls the global political commitment to fighting climate change made by 175 Parties, including the European Union and its Member States, who signed the Paris Agreement at the signing ceremony in New York on 22 April 2016, and recognises that more Parties have signed thereafter.

The Council recalls the March 2016 European Council Conclusions underlining the need for the European Union and its Member States to be able to ratify the Paris Agreement as soon as possible and on time so as to be Parties as of its entry into force.

The Council notes the growing international political momentum in favour of early entry into force of the Paris Agreement and also calls for ratification of the Agreement by the European Union and its Member States as soon as possible. In this context the Council calls on Member States and the European Union to start taking the necessary steps to finalise their respective ratification procedures, in accordance with their constitutional and/or other provisions, as soon as possible, and to endeavour to take the necessary steps with a view  to deposit collectively their ratification instruments with the UN Secretary General.

The Council welcomes that a number of Member States have already initiated and some already completed their national ratification procedures.

The Council also welcomes the submission by the European Commission of a proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Paris Agreement. Implementation of the Paris Agreement has been high on the agenda of the Council at the technical and political level.

The Council confirms its commitment to implement, as a priority, the 2030 regulatory framework set out in the European Council conclusions of October 2014, including the binding EU 2030 climate target to reduce EU greenhouse gas emissions domestically by at least 40% compared to 1990 emissions. On 15 July 2015 the European Commission published a proposal to reform the EU emissions trading system and the European Commission will come with other proposals in the non-ETS sectors as of July 2016, in line with the EU and its Member States intended nationally determined contribution.

The Council affirms its intention to regularly take stock of progress made in the domestic ratification procedures in all Member States."


Stanley Johnson, and MPs Caroline Lucas (Green ) & Harriet Harman (Labour)  on a wildlife reserve making the environmental  case for staying in the EU GztqDVnCid