CND
general secretary Dr Kate Hudson gave an accurate potted history of the opposition
to siting in the UK of US intermediate range nuclear weapons [INF] (“Nuclear
escalation must be resisted,” Guardian, letter, 25 October) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/24/nuclear-escalation-must-be-resisted
This followed your foreign
affairs commentator, Simon Tisdall, making the interesting proposal in his
article on the decision by President Trump to withdraw from the INF treaty (“A
nuclear threat worse than the cold war: now it’s a possibility,” 24 October
2018; https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/23/trump-nuclear-cold-war-russia-arms)
that now is the time for the UK and
France to unilaterally give up their nuclear weapons “pour encourager les
autres” such as Israel, India and Pakistan to do the same.
Unfortunately, the UK
government seem to think the opposite, and back Trump in dumping the INF
treaty.
But there is a chink of light
on the horizon: in responding to an ‘urgent question’ on the US decision on INF
in Parliament on Thursday, foreign office minister Mark Field said:
“It is
important to recognise that the US has not yet withdrawn from this treaty.
While the treaty remains in force, we shall continue to support it, and in
particular to press Russia to return to full and verifiable compliance. Indeed,
it is worth noting .. that Presidents Trump and Putin plan to meet in France
next month—on Remembrance Sunday—to discuss this further…. It is very much the policy to reduce
the number of nuclear weapons. We shall continue to work with all partners
across the international community to prevent proliferation and to make
progress on multilateral nuclear disarmament.” (Hansard, 25 October; https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-10-25/debates/A2C96C11-504A-4465-B547-3D7D4B2C0550/NuclearTreatyUSWithdrawal)
Mr Field then
told Conservative MP Jeremy Lefroy that “I reassure my hon.
Friend that a lot of work [ on nuclear disarmament] does go on,” but failed to
give any details
The UK has an
international legal pledge to enter “in good faith” into multilateral negotiations
towards nuclear disarmament “at an early
date “ since July 1968, when it signed the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.
Yet the UK
has not once in 50 years entered any of its nuclear weapons into multilateral
nuclear negotiations! That demonstrates very bad faith indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment